refers to the landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It is additionally a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

maintaining the conviction awarded to the appellant reduce the sentence on the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

prolonged period petitioner was not regarded as for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and consider the petitioner (Promotion)

The recent amendment to Section 489-F of your Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.

                                                                  

Electronic and paper court records retained at the court site is often viewed with the courthouse for free, however there is actually a fee of ten cents per page to print from a public access terminal.

9.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

I)       The above referred case FIR, with the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered about the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father of your petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is really an eyewkness on the occurrence.

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment in the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.

three. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of legislation and ensuring read more that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay fixation are not entertainable for that reasons that such matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient therefore this petition is dismissed, which includes disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is just not within a position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and regarded researchers to review and rule on potential grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.